3 ms·

To be honest, I don't know what you're saying. All I wanted to say was that those three sites could be technically created using HTML5. You then seemed to say

by jeff18 17y ago

To be honest, I don't know what you're saying. All I wanted to say was that those three sites could be technically created using HTML5. You then seemed to say that HTML5 doesn't actually let you create the effects exhibited in those websites. I corrected you and referred you to the modules. Sorry for any misunderstandings. If we are clear on the above, and you would like to bring up a new point, I'd be happy to engage in a separate debate.

tomlin 17y ago
You then seemed to say that HTML5 doesn't actually let you create the effects exhibited in those websites. I corrected you and referred you to the modules. The side-step again. The examples that you gave (a vague reference to ADC) did not support your argument. You might remember: "Show me http://mycanvas.landsend.com http://mycanvas.landsend.com or http://www.myspace.com/fanvideo http://www.myspace.com/fanvideo in HTML5." It was apparent to me that we had moved away from the Blizzard sites. The very simplistic Blizzard sites (which I agree could be done in HTML5 to some extent) are not what I would consider heavy or complex. I asked: "I wanna see this level of complexity without a hindrance on development time, performance or scope." You replied with the same double talk I expect in a Flash vs. HTML5 thread: "I'd recommend checking out the CSS animation / transitions modules at the W3C to get familiarized. " You mean the fully implemented CSS transitions? If you can't give examples, then just say that. Don't come back with a vague blanket statement.
- jeff18 17y ago
  Both of those websites, like the Blizzard sites could be completely done in HTML5. Is there a specific element that you believe could not? I already explained why I cannot give you an example of a AAA HTML5 website (Internet Explorer doesn't support it). If you'd like to discuss the technical aspects of HTML5, feel free to email me at jeff@wolfire.com - I am going to stop checking this thread.

by jeff18 17y ago

tomlin 17y ago

You then seemed to say that HTML5 doesn't actually let you create the effects exhibited in those websites. I corrected you and referred you to the modules. The side-step again. The examples that you gave (a vague reference to ADC) did not support your argument. You might remember: "Show me http://mycanvas.landsend.com http://mycanvas.landsend.com or http://www.myspace.com/fanvideo http://www.myspace.com/fanvideo in HTML5." It was apparent to me that we had moved away from the Blizzard sites. The very simplistic Blizzard sites (which I agree could be done in HTML5 to some extent) are not what I would consider heavy or complex. I asked: "I wanna see this level of complexity without a hindrance on development time, performance or scope." You replied with the same double talk I expect in a Flash vs. HTML5 thread: "I'd recommend checking out the CSS animation / transitions modules at the W3C to get familiarized. " You mean the fully implemented CSS transitions? If you can't give examples, then just say that. Don't come back with a vague blanket statement.

jeff18 17y ago
Both of those websites, like the Blizzard sites could be completely done in HTML5. Is there a specific element that you believe could not? I already explained why I cannot give you an example of a AAA HTML5 website (Internet Explorer doesn't support it). If you'd like to discuss the technical aspects of HTML5, feel free to email me at jeff@wolfire.com - I am going to stop checking this thread.