4 ms·
I wonder if the same issue exist in GraphicsMagick. Also, I am surprised how few people have switched from ImageMagick to graphocksMagic, given that the fork h
by dorfsmay 11y ago
I wonder if the same issue exist in GraphicsMagick.
Also, I am surprised how few people have switched from ImageMagick to graphocksMagic, given that the fork happened back in 2002 and that it offers significant improvements.
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/ http://www.graphicsmagick.org/
- Danack 11y ago"it offers significant improvements." - citation needed. It was better for a period after the fork, but the only guy working on it hasn't maintained it that well...there's a significant number of bugs in GraphicsMagick that have been there for years.
- Anthony-G 11y agoI've always chosen GraphicsMagick over ImageMagick because it has far fewer dependencies on other packages and it provides the features I want.