3 ms·
Apparently Paperclip library already covered this long before this vulnerability is published. https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/issues/2190#issuecomment
by whizzkid 10y ago
Apparently Paperclip library already covered this long before this vulnerability is published.
https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/issues/2190#issuecomment-216638180 https://github.com/thoughtbot/paperclip/issues/2190#issuecom...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- tyingq 10y agoWell, they check the filetype. I wouldn't be so certain that covers all the bases. Read this: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/03/18 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/03/18
- whizzkid 10y agoOf course I would like to see specific tests that covers everything about this vulnerability. I see now that there are more problems than the one mentioned in the article. But the link submitted to hackernews specifically mentioned "magic bytes" which is the file type problem. I think Paperclip is not affected on that one.