> For some there is no burden of proof high enough later: > You should be sceptical. You should question. I would. So he's saying people are being too skepti

> For some there is no burden of proof high enough later: > You should be sceptical. You should question. I would. So he's saying people are being too skeptical, and then he says people should be skeptical. This guy really has no idea what he's talking about. There's no way he's Satoshi, he reads like a con-artist.