2 ms·
The career obsessed part is interesting, because in public its mostly unacceptable to discuss the topic. So people talk about jobs and income instead of cultur
by VLM 11y ago
The career obsessed part is interesting, because in public its mostly unacceptable to discuss the topic. So people talk about jobs and income instead of culture and wealth. Aside from the great american fantasy that we're all equal other than the minor detail of where we go to work today, LOL.
In literature its quite a bit different. "Class" by Paul Fussell goes over the cultural differences while glossing over mere employment. I enjoyed that book, it was fun reading it and seeing how accurately he called out various class behavior I observed growing up, he's pretty accurate top to bottom, from what I've observed. The book is about 25 years old and it would be interesting to see a more modern book. Seen in a Fussell point of view from 25 years ago, the whole social media fad sounds extremely middle class by his definitions of pathological desire for signalling and likes, for example, and has no appeal to what Fussell would describe as the extremes, although where I live twitter users seem exclusively the absolute lowest classes, which is strange. From a Fussell point of view TV has gone from mostly middle class culturally in terms of interests and attitudes in the 70s to exclusively prole feed. Its very unusual now to see anything on TV that isn't prole in attitudes and desires and outlook and values as defined by Fussell.