4 ms·
I think what they are saying is that she is independently wealthy - as such they didn't check into her husband in the same way they would have if she depended
by untog 11y ago
I think what they are saying is that she is independently wealthy - as such they didn't check into her husband in the same way they would have if she depended on him for money.
- simula67 11y agoI take it that you are not claiming it is not wrong ? Regardless of whether she depends on her husband for money, or if she was independently rich, there can still be conflict of interest.
- untog 11y agoI'm not claiming anything. It's obviously wrong, and the editor admits as such - I was just paraphrasing their reasoning behind the mistake.