4 ms·
I know we weren't supposed to comment on this, but the truth is, it's impossible to evaluate these like this. Doing such a shallow pass is just completely unf
by blazespin 11y ago
I know we weren't supposed to comment on this, but the truth is, it's impossible to evaluate these like this. Doing such a shallow pass is just completely unfair to the founders here.
I think a better idea would be more of a facemash approach, where you have to evaluate just two and pick which one is better. That way you can do a deeper dive and say something sensible with your vote rather than something stupid.
I vote that the results are thrown out from this thread and a round robin type approach is done.
- dang 11y agoPlease bring this up in the post-mortem thread. It's a good point and will fall through the cracks if left here.
- vishalkgupta 10y agoI second the idea that a facesmash like approach could really be a much better idea of how to handle this. It's easier to view one startup vs another instead of looking at voting on 20. There are some stand outs that may just run over their opponents, but maybe there's some way to normalize that to some degree.