4 ms·
The link isn't broken, and I have absolutely read it. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.21538/full http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.
by Jweb_Guru 11y ago
The link isn't broken, and I have absolutely read it. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.21538/full http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.21538/full. Please note their methodology. And metabolic adaptation is fairly well established at this point, it doesn't just apply to people who lose tons of weight at a rapid rate.
- anatoly 11y agoHi, can you address this comment on reddit that I found interesting? https://www.reddit.com/r/Health/comments/4hhdsj/the_science_of_fat_after_the_biggest_loser_their/d2re6qs https://www.reddit.com/r/Health/comments/4hhdsj/the_science_... On the face of it it isn't obvious to me why using a least-square model trained on just the baseline of these 16 individuals (the way they predict RMR in the paper) is better than the standard equation, and if the standard equation is a much closer fit to measurement, this seems suspect. But I know next to nothing about metabolic measurements.