What's the point in putting out blatantly fraudulent evidence (and that's what he put out) if he's actually the creator? If he's the creator and wants to be re

What's the point in putting out blatantly fraudulent evidence (and that's what he put out) if he's actually the creator? If he's the creator and wants to be recognized, he puts out real evidence. If he's the creator and doesn't want to be recognized, he says nothing and is never heard from. If he's not the creator, we get this flim-flammery.