3 ms·
Same story for those who prefer it on TechCrunch: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1161526 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1161526 ADDED IN EDIT: tl;dr
by RiderOfGiraffes 17y ago
Same story for those who prefer it on TechCrunch: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1161526 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1161526
ADDED IN EDIT:
tl;dr - I think cross referencing is a Good Thing(tm).
Clearly some people here think that this comment detracted from the value of HN. I can accept that, and I don't mind the loss of karma. Let me just explain that as a programmer I abhor unnecessary duplication. Equally, though, as an infophile I like to get different angles on each story, to try to see if there's any extras. So when I see the same story from different sources I like to read them all, but equally, I prefer that discussion and comments end up in one place.
So I try to add value to HN in part by making sure these things get cross-referenced. Mostly I think people find it harmless. Some people actively dislike it and vote me down, others actively like it and vote me up. Yet others find it both irritating and useful in equal measure, so no doubt they are confused and conflicted. That's their problem.
But I'm slowly stopping doing this anyway. I get the occasional comment saying it's really appreciated, but in general I'm reducing the time I spend here anyway.
And that's the rationale behind the comment.
ADDED FURTHER IN EDIT: Or perhaps you saw that I'd got the reference wrong and just down-voted me instead of bothering to tell me. Now I'm really disappointed in the HN crowd. I've fixed the reference.
- nailer 17y agoI appreciate the need to get different angles, TechCrunch however isn't a credible source of information (they throw great parties though). I'd love to see a Mashable or CodeSketch or whatever perspective though. Someone else contributed John Gruber's post on the topic and was modded up accordingly.