> if a judge order the company to share a specific user data, the company must comply. > They would have lawyers fighting against the decision to share the use

> if a judge order the company to share a specific user data, the company must comply. > They would have lawyers fighting against the decision to share the user data and this would be solved by the justice system (never coming to have its activity suspended). So what would happen? Like you said that law, if you paraphrased it correctly, is very clear - how would lawyers shouting about it actually help? Would they change the law the first time WhatsApp fight back? Presumably not - otherwise the law would be pointless wouldn't it? So how would that stop their activity being suspended? I'm trying to avoid jumping to conclusions, but to give you a chance to just tell me I'm wrong - is this protectionism?