4 ms·
It would be obstruction, not destruction. The evidence still exists, but you took steps to prevent law enforcement access to it. Destruction would be some sort
by jdmichal 11y ago
It would be obstruction, not destruction. The evidence still exists, but you took steps to prevent law enforcement access to it. Destruction would be some sort of kill signal to the phone when they ask you to unlock it.
- Lawtonfogle 11y ago>It would be obstruction, not destruction. It is obstruction in the same way that requesting a warrant before handing over evidence is obstruction.
- jdmichal 11y agoYour comment is purposefully obtuse and meaningless. Obstruction via exercising your 4th amendment right in the US is legal, because that's what being a right means. Refusing to comply with a court order to unlock your phone is still illegal.