3 ms·
This might be off topic, but there are a few comments on here (mostly) joking about why we even should bother designing planes like the F-35 to be operated loca
by Impl0x 10y ago
This might be off topic, but there are a few comments on here (mostly) joking about why we even should bother designing planes like the F-35 to be operated locally by humans.
I'm curious, does anyone have any info on the state of drone fighter planes, either remotely piloted or completely autonomous?
Does such a project even merit consideration when we could innovate missile systems instead?
- thinkcontext 10y agoDrones are not a good replacement for the traditional fighter aircraft. Remote piloting has too much latency for dogfights and software is no where near smart enough to trust full autonomy in order to, say, shoot down another plane. That said, would you consider a cruise missile a drone? One can imagine other types of weapons getting smarter. Additionally, its clear the roles that drones tackle will expand at the expense of manned aircraft.
- Pinckney 10y agoWhat about a semi-autonomous fighter, with a pilot to provide low latency input on what to shoot, and the plane deciding how to fly and make that shot independently? You could even have the pilot prone for higher G tolerance, like they tried in some of the old Gloster Meteors, since their input is no longer necessary for all of its operation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor_F8_"Prone_Pilot" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor_F8_"Prone_Pilot...