> Courts are not (and should not be) interested in "the law as it should be." They are to interpret the law as it is written. I agree, but then neither are we

> Courts are not (and should not be) interested in "the law as it should be." They are to interpret the law as it is written. I agree, but then neither are we the courts; and it is precisely the role of the commons to discuss the law as it should be, so that the legislative branch can, hopefully, enshrine that communal wisdom in the law as it is.