4 ms·

A lot of travelers can barely afford to fly as it is. The only way this fast lane can function is if it's exclusive to a small segment of flyers. Do we really

by raldi 11y ago

A lot of travelers can barely afford to fly as it is. The only way this fast lane can function is if it's exclusive to a small segment of flyers. Do we really need to keep widening the gap between the haves and have-nots?

malka 11y ago
> Do we really need to keep widening the gap between the haves and have-nots? The cynical and nihilistic me says 'yes'. Let's push it to see at what point it crumbles.
- gnaritas 11y ago
  It's not going to crumble, pushing it just pushes us ever close to a full blown police state; a direction we're already headed. The people aren't going to get fed up and stop anything, they're going to cower to the power like sheep as we slowly become a full blown fascist state.
gnaritas 11y ago
> Do we really need to keep widening the gap between the haves and have-nots? That is what the U.S. is all about.
- raldi 11y ago
  As opposed to what other country?
kelnos 11y ago
A lot of travelers can barely afford to fly as it is. I can certainly understand that the family of four who only gets to travel once per several years might find $85 per person to be a burden, but I still can't believe that for most people who travel it's that much of a problem. I mean, a US domestic transcon flight is going to run you at the cheapest $300 round trip (and that's only by shopping around like crazy, having super flexible travel dates, and taking advantage of travel deals). Do that once a year, and your $300 flight becomes $317 with precheck. I know many Americans are frankly terrible at personal finance, but... c'mon. Even something shorter like a SFO<->LAX trip is going to run you at least a hundred. The only way this fast lane can function is if it's exclusive to a small segment of flyers. If there's only one fast lane, sure. My hope would be that as more people enroll in precheck, they'll be able to turn more and more "regular" lanes into precheck lanes, keeping the efficiency (or lack thereof) of both lane types the same.

by raldi 11y ago

malka 11y ago

> Do we really need to keep widening the gap between the haves and have-nots? The cynical and nihilistic me says 'yes'. Let's push it to see at what point it crumbles.

gnaritas 11y ago
It's not going to crumble, pushing it just pushes us ever close to a full blown police state; a direction we're already headed. The people aren't going to get fed up and stop anything, they're going to cower to the power like sheep as we slowly become a full blown fascist state.

gnaritas 11y ago

> Do we really need to keep widening the gap between the haves and have-nots? That is what the U.S. is all about.

raldi 11y ago
As opposed to what other country?

kelnos 11y ago

A lot of travelers can barely afford to fly as it is. I can certainly understand that the family of four who only gets to travel once per several years might find $85 per person to be a burden, but I still can't believe that for most people who travel it's that much of a problem. I mean, a US domestic transcon flight is going to run you at the cheapest $300 round trip (and that's only by shopping around like crazy, having super flexible travel dates, and taking advantage of travel deals). Do that once a year, and your $300 flight becomes $317 with precheck. I know many Americans are frankly terrible at personal finance, but... c'mon. Even something shorter like a SFO<->LAX trip is going to run you at least a hundred. The only way this fast lane can function is if it's exclusive to a small segment of flyers. If there's only one fast lane, sure. My hope would be that as more people enroll in precheck, they'll be able to turn more and more "regular" lanes into precheck lanes, keeping the efficiency (or lack thereof) of both lane types the same.