4 ms·

I like vi better than emacs in general (it probably has to do with my learning unix without X and basically vi was the only editor to use), but vi doesn't work

I like vi better than emacs in general (it probably has to do with my learning unix without X and basically vi was the only editor to use), but vi doesn't work as an IDE for Common Lisp. Vial (http://common-lisp.net/project/vial/ http://common-lisp.net/project/vial/) was started with that goal, i.e., to provide SLIME-like functionality for vi but it's one of those still-in-progress (and may never actually release anything useful) projects.

mqt 19y ago
Brad Beveridge abandoned development on both vial and slim-vim. He conceded and now uses emacs+vimpulse. [1] Many people that come to Lisp from vi tend to be very hesistant to use emacs. I spent weeks trying to use vilisp.vim and viper-mode but eventually learned to live with emacs. It was worth it. http://www.lispniks.com/pipermail/slim-vim/2007-May/000556.html http://www.lispniks.com/pipermail/slim-vim/2007-May/000556.h...
- kflasch 19y ago
  That's where I find myself now. I'm trying to bite the bullet and just use emacs for daily tasks, but it's hard to switch!
ardit33 19y ago
Let's be honest, 99.9% of developers out there don't care much about lisp. Emacs vs. Vim has been a long standing debate, so it would never resloved here. Frankly, I just use Textpad, and/or Eclipse, and ocassionally GVIM.
- pchristensen 19y ago
  That's true. I care about Lisp so that's where I'm starting (hence the emphasis on SLIME more than Emacs). After I get better, I'll probably make an Emacs-only cheat sheet that's applicable to non-Lisp programmers.