Yup, Dutch media it was less bad but still not great. Instead of saying it was a 'claim', or preferably not writing anything about this scam, they wrote 'Wrigh

Yup, Dutch media it was less bad but still not great. Instead of saying it was a 'claim', or preferably not writing anything about this scam, they wrote 'Wright admits he's Satoshi' in the title. This 'admitting' implies everyone thought he was Satoshi, and he confirmed it. When in reality, everyone thinks he's definitely not it, and he claimed it without proof. Then in the article they make completely false claims about him signing messages he didn't etc. It's really sad, there wasn't a hint of skepticism that was present in the Economist which I thought was poor itself already.