Since the article relies on PolitiFact's conclusions so heavily I kept waiting for the author to at least acknowledge some of his assumptions about PolitiFact.

Since the article relies on PolitiFact's conclusions so heavily I kept waiting for the author to at least acknowledge some of his assumptions about PolitiFact. And since this article was largely about misinformation, it is hard to ignore the irony of blindly accepting the conclusions of what is really just another partisan site with its own agenda. > "For instance, I thought Sanders was more truthful than Clinton. I has also assumed that Rubio was as bad as Cruz. But, as you can see, my personal assumptions were wrong." Then you see statements like those in the article -- does the author really believe that someone's overall truthfulness can be gauged in this manner?