3 ms·
As with most deep learning papers, though, the results aren't independently reproducible. The dataset is private, the source is closed, and it hasn't been turne
by mintplant 11y ago
As with most deep learning papers, though, the results aren't independently reproducible. The dataset is private, the source is closed, and it hasn't been turned into a product. The magic inking button is still a ways off yet.
- Chronic51 11y agoThey're not required to release code and a dataset. If you can get away with doing less why not? Everyone in every discipline does this. Finance, home improvement, retail, consulting...
- joshuak 11y agoIs this source and data set not open? Is this not the source: https://github.com/satoshiiizuka/siggraph2016_colorization https://github.com/satoshiiizuka/siggraph2016_colorization And is this not the dataset: http://places.csail.mit.edu http://places.csail.mit.edu I'm really asking, because I've downloaded the project and skimmed the paper, but haven't had time to vet these assumptions. On the face of it, it seems everything is provided, but you've vetted it further and learned that isn't true?
- mintplant 11y agoI'm talking about the auto-inker project that BunnyRubenstein linked, not the auto-colorization project from the parent submission.