4 ms·
Bottom line is that this could've just been a billing error from the outset that it took Apple two years to correct. Howells is making the assumption it was a
by zuminator 10y ago
Bottom line is that this could've just been a billing error from the outset that it took Apple two years to correct. Howells is making the assumption it was a school district with no evidence whatsoever. If it was Apple's policy to refund school district 3rd party app purchases regardless of time, we would be hearing this complaint constantly, not just from this one guy.
- asddubs 10y agothe problem is that apple is not giving any information whatsoever.
- hackaflocka 10y agoProblem is what if he bought a new house in the mean time based on this billing error. He could end up bankrupt because of this billing error.
- hackaflocka 10y agoProblem is what if he bought a new house in the mean time based on this billing error. He could end up bankrupt because of this billing error.
- vsl 10y ago> Howells is making the assumption it was a school district with no evidence whatsoever. You are making an assumption that he has no evidence with no evidence whatsoever. Apple provides educational discounts (if you allow it in your app’s iTC settings). He could almost certainly tell the purchase was from a school simply by dividing the reported revenue by the number of sold copies and comparing it with their regular price in the (also visible in the report) country.