3 ms·
Yeah I kinda figured from the URL that this was a less-than-reputable source. But a lot of the other comments bring up a good point, I don't think this is "labe
by bunkydoo 10y ago
Yeah I kinda figured from the URL that this was a less-than-reputable source. But a lot of the other comments bring up a good point, I don't think this is "labeling someone as a criminal by any means" but it is giving them a new type of leverage to identify what "probable cause" means in a digital crime case.
It's very similar to having marijuana in the car - the police need 2 signs to get a warrant (usually red eyes and odor) in this case you'd have to give them 2 signs you were conducting some sort of illegal activity using something like TOR and they'd have a warrant. But what they would be able to do with that warrant is largely subject to each individual case - encryption making it increasingly difficult for them to do their job in some.