3 ms·
Smart guns have an interesting history. In the 90's Colt developed a smart gun, but the results "backfired." Anti-gun groups were against it because of the idea
by dpflan 11y ago
Smart guns have an interesting history. In the 90's Colt developed a smart gun, but the results "backfired." Anti-gun groups were against it because of the idea that safer guns meant that the barrier to entry to ownership was lower (now that guns are "safer", why not have one?); people who depended upon guns for their livelihood were skeptical: when you need to use one there needs to be no questions that it will function (barring all the traditional issues of "dumb" gun); if successful, other manufacturings would have to follow suit and there could be legal actions against "dumb" gun manufacturing and ownershpi...etc.
I've linked some articles that touch upon this attempt by Colt.
NRP Article:
http://www.npr.org/2016/04/07/473416699/how-an-idea-to-develop-a-safer-smart-gun-backfired http://www.npr.org/2016/04/07/473416699/how-an-idea-to-devel...
Hacker News Discussion of Article:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11462297 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11462297
- hga 11y agoFrom the beginning of the first comment in the HN discussion you link to: he explained that it was only supposed to fire if the shooter was wearing a special wristband with a little radio frequency transmitter inside. The CEO put on the wristband and went to pull the trigger. ... And it didn't shoot. Just silence. An "oops" which is entirely unacceptable for any law enforcement/self defense use case.
- pbh101 11y agoSlightly redundant, but I also enjoyed the (apparently contemporary) Planet Money podcast episode on the same topic: http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2016/04/08/473581490/episode-694-the-gun-that-wouldnt-shoot http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2016/04/08/473581490/episo...