> I don't know how you read that question (well, ok, I do), but it's not how I read it. Whiff of an insult duly noted. I don't know how you read "provide searc

> I don't know how you read that question (well, ok, I do), but it's not how I read it. Whiff of an insult duly noted. I don't know how you read "provide search engines with indexable dynamic pages" as implementing your own search engine. It was pretty clearly referencing the well-known challenge of making your JavaScript-rendered pages indexable by Google/Bing/etc. > Whoever said we were railing on SPAs? You are. When you say we should just abandon all this JavaScript and instead render everything through Rails, you're arguing against building SPAs.