3 ms·
The core of systemd revolves around units, but the "systemd ecosystem" has expanded to logging (journalctl), bus management, a new way to set the hostname (host
by cfallin 10y ago
The core of systemd revolves around units, but the "systemd ecosystem" has expanded to logging (journalctl), bus management, a new way to set the hostname (hostnamectl), a login manager, fstab parsing and disk management, a new session/login management framework, networking (systemd-netword, or is it netctl now, or do people use NetworkManager? I'm on Arch and ended up choosing netctl but I still don't understand all the tradeoffs), and I'm probably missing something.
Don't get me wrong -- I actually like some of the new thinking, appreciate parallelized bootups, and think service units are cleaner than the old /etc/rc.d mudball. I'd rather have things Just Work(tm) than play with wpa_supplicant and hibernate configurations on my laptop. But it's been a lot of new stuff to learn for someone used to the Old Ways, and it's kind of astonishing how fast systemd pieces have taken over different domains.
- chris_wot 10y agoYeah, it can make my head spin too sometimes. But I just don't think that rapid change makes things more inherently complex for a system per se, it just means folks like us have to do more reading (and more grousing, I quite enjoy doing that on occasion, I must admit). Oh boy, I've just realised - I'm growing older! Eep.
- bitwize 10y agowpa_supplicant Just Works. NetworkManager is more like NightmareManager.