3 ms·
> Took around 2000 lines all in all....The line-count went up, of course, easily to 15000 lines. Inexperienced programmers can make bad decisions in any setti
by seanwilson 11y ago
> Took around 2000 lines all in all....The line-count went up, of course, easily to 15000 lines.
Inexperienced programmers can make bad decisions in any setting so I don't think this has anything to do with frameworks. I would be heavily against any decision that bloats a codebase 7 times its original size unless the pros heavily outweighed the cons.
People tend to associate poor coding mostly with spaghetti code and copy/paste everywhere, but poor coding also includes adding useless tests and abstracting too much.
- Buttons840 11y agoI agree. We can make subjective arguments over this or that framework all day. But objectively speaking 15,000 lines is likely to be more difficult to maintain than 2,000.