3 ms·

Those 1% can visit public issued computers, public wifi, libraries, etc... Internet is a basic human right in most developed countries, this is a non-issue.

• fpgeek 10y ago
  We're not talking about most developed countries, we're talking about the United States. The Internet, like many other things that are considered basic human rights in other countries, isn't a basic human right here. You can talk about using libraries and publicly-issues to fill the gaps, but, unfortunately, US politicians know how to game those things. They'll manipulate funding for public computers, change library hours and maybe even relocate libraries to gain a small electoral advantages. And before you say they won't, that's exactly what happens today with polling places, distribution of voting machines and (in states that require photo ID to vote) locations and hours of DMVs (and any other places you can use to get a state-issued photo ID).
  • dsfuoi 10y ago
    If it is already happening, they switching to certificates is better because you don't need a special voting machine, as every internet access point becomes one. Available in: libraries, coffee places, public wifi, neighbours, friends, mobile phone, etc...
  • tootie 10y ago
    I don't see why politicians would actively oppose something like this. It's more a matter of practicality. There's barely a handful of countries that hold internet access a human right and they still don't have 100% penetration. Just a right that access has to be available. A working computer or smartphone costs money on its own. The US is about 88% which is pretty good, but not 100%. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2 http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2
• vowelless 10y ago
  "Why electronic voting is a bad idea" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3_0x6oaDmI