3 ms·
Firstly, I didn't intend to "troll" Microsoft. Well, I agree with the last sentence. Satya Nadella was the much needed U-turn from the Balmer era. It's just th
by arsalanb 10y ago
Firstly, I didn't intend to "troll" Microsoft.
Well, I agree with the last sentence. Satya Nadella was the much needed U-turn from the Balmer era. It's just that by the standards Microsoft has set for itself, they've under-performed over the years. I'm talking about major failed experiments like Windows Vista, Lumia (or even the entire Nokia acquisition)
- crandycodes 10y agoAnd I think that's why the "Satya U-Turn" is so promising. Vista and Lumia were Ballmer-era failures. I work at Microsoft on Azure; it feels like a new era. The open source feel is real, even if we might fail at it here and there. PMs on the freaking SQL Server team were using Macs, because they want to feel the pain of SQL users on Macs. It's really good stuff.
- arsalanb 10y agoAbsolutely. Now by my estimation there is still some effort going into supporting those Ballmer-era failures, but such is the burden of being a company as large as Microsoft. Microsoft without the dead-weight of having to support failed tech — Now that is a place I would like to work. Edit: Do you think that Microsoft is actively taking steps in trying to do away with supporting things like Vista, etc?