>p.s. try breaking up your wall of text in future posts, it makes your response really difficult to read. I normally do. See my other reply in this thread belo

>p.s. try breaking up your wall of text in future posts, it makes your response really difficult to read. I normally do. See my other reply in this thread below. I'll admit I was first set off by your seemingly condescending remark of 'simple people...'; I should know better. And not to get into too much of an OT style/usage thread, but the use of 'said' could be removed from your sentences as they are written. It is popular in legal writing as an abbreviation for 'aforesaid' or 'aforementioned', but also comes off as an affectation when used unnecessarily. My point about some people bringing in, or championing a framework for a freelance gig, is that sometimes it is done to get some paid time learning that framework for future jobs. I think is it is disingenuous to dismiss that factor. As a senior manager and director, I have seen people let their personal goals bias their decision making in all types of business. I still don't think the article was against using frameworks. I think it was about questioning or revisiting your reasons for choosing them.