3 ms·
Popularity plays a role. Here's a real life example: One of my quantum physics mentors submitted a paper to PRL (a high prestige physics journal) and it was r
by alphydan 10y ago
Popularity plays a role. Here's a real life example: One of my quantum physics mentors submitted a paper to PRL (a high prestige physics journal) and it was rejected. Why? Because it came from a small, rather unknown university in Spain.
He was later admitted to Cambridge for a PhD and sent the exact same paper (same formatting, content, layout but different department/uni). It was immediately accepted. Does it necessarily mean that scientists in poorer countries are doing bad science? Or just that they didn't get their visa / couldn't leave their country / just want to stay there, etc.
The first filter most editors use is: "Do I know this research group? Are they part of the club? Have they published in top journals?". If not, it won't get read (unless it's a compelling and exciting title and abstract).
- joshvm 10y agoPhys Rev Lett isn't double blind? Double blind doesn't always work, sometimes it's painfully obvious who the PI is, but it should stop stuff like this from happening.
- alphydan 10y agoI haven't published there in a while but I don't think so. > We are no longer able to accede to requests from authors that we withhold their identities from the referees. Such "double-blind" reviewing has been discontinued. [0] [0] https://journals.aps.org/prl/authors/editorial-policies-practices https://journals.aps.org/prl/authors/editorial-policies-prac...