3 ms·
I was using google speaking keyboard. I was at a stoplight and spoke it and submitted. I'm all for scientific method, be it showing positive, negative, or no r
by kefka 10y ago
I was using google speaking keyboard. I was at a stoplight and spoke it and submitted.
I'm all for scientific method, be it showing positive, negative, or no results. I also know what isn't currently scientific, although I do have curiosity if some of those 'things' can indeed be proved.
- maaku 10y agoEverything is "scientific" so long as it is subjected to unbiased skeptical experimental evaluation. That's all it means to be "scientific."
- bigfudge 10y agoScience needn't mean experiments. Just ask astronomers.
- MacsHeadroom 10y agoHypothesizing then observing or reviewing past observations to verify the hypothesis is a form of experimentation. Every revelation of astronomy has been the result of experiments.
- nxzero 10y agoThis is not how science works, that is just paying attention to results that back your hypothesis or biases; in fact, doing this is not science at all. EDIT: An example of this in the wild is how drug companies would cherry pick research to back the outcome the wanted; cherry picking is an anti-pattern of true science.
- chris_wot 10y agoHappens to the best of us. My editing issues is Apple's autocorrect, I get some truly strange results sometimes. That makes sense - though I hope you don't mind me asking but when you say "I also know what isn't currently scientific", do you mean untested hypotheses?