4 ms·
Reviewers work for free for a few reasons reasons. First, it's prestigious to be a reviewer for a top journal and very beneficial for getting tenure. Second, it
by richard_mcp 10y ago
Reviewers work for free for a few reasons reasons. First, it's prestigious to be a reviewer for a top journal and very beneficial for getting tenure. Second, it allows you to create connections with other top researchers. Third, it's giving back to the community by doing a service that needs to be done.
- dalke 10y agoHow do people know that I have (or haven't) been a reviewer for a top journal? Do they have a public list of reviewers? Of the people I meet at a conference, how do I figure out who has been a reviewer for Nature, and how do I verify that claim?
- mbrundle 10y agoMy thoughts exactly. I've never known a journal to do anything to promote the fact that someone has reviewed for them (eg produce a letter on request that states which articles someone has reviewed for them). It'd be a nice and free way of creating value to reviewers who generally work for free, but I don't know any journal who's ever done this.