2 ms·
Well it's not like you divided it up like this: 1. Lazy people 2. Not lazy people. Haven't you encountered those 1. types that profit by passing on security
by 0xdeadbeefbabe 11y ago
Well it's not like you divided it up like this:
1. Lazy people
2. Not lazy people.
Haven't you encountered those 1. types that profit by passing on security rumors and pushing papers instead of examining software?
There was a nice presentation by some 2. types that recommended using delimiters in your network protocols instead of [length] data. But I can't find it yet.