> (c)that the photograph [F5or pseudo-photograph] was sent to him without any prior request made by him or on his behalf and that he did not keep it for an unre

> (c)that the photograph [F5or pseudo-photograph] was sent to him without any prior request made by him or on his behalf and that he did not keep it for an unreasonable time. I can't find the citation, but there was a case brought up in my uni it ethics/law module that noted that visiting a website that then downloaded something like that in the background was sufficient to disqualify that condition from applying, as there was a prior request to visit the webpage that delivered the image. even if the website wasn't visited with the intention of the image. and the person involved was jailed. they may have gotten out on appeal mind, but again, i can't remember more details than that to verify