This article has lots of false assumptions. I agree. In fact, this article is so preconcieved reading it's last sentence felt like: 'scrolling, scrolling to c

This article has lots of false assumptions. I agree. In fact, this article is so preconcieved reading it's last sentence felt like: 'scrolling, scrolling to continue reading after the ads... aaaand... where is the reasoning-part and the criterion-part of this piece?' Considering the article's lack of substance and the subsequent unquestioning cheering here on HN, this article delivers less enlightenment on the future of EV than it is a statement about the bias on HN towards EV. And probably about the bias in the valley as well.