3 ms·
Uh.... what? It says "he would NOT be required to relinquish majority voting control". And that he WOULD be able to pass his voting shares to children; "thus
by forrestthewoods 11y ago
Uh.... what?
It says "he would NOT be required to relinquish majority voting control".
And that he WOULD be able to pass his voting shares to children; "thus leading to potential multi-generational majority voting control of the company"
Which is the opposite of what you just said...
- abhi3 11y agoThat is what the current situation is, that changes with this deal.
- forrestthewoods 11y agoAh, you're right! You should have included those quotes too. :) "The new arrangement will convert Zuckerberg's high-vote B shares into A shares if he dies, is fired for cause, or resigns."
- pc86 11y ago> You should have included those quotes too. You should have read the article.
- forrestthewoods 11y agoIt's a work day. I skim articles. Most people skim. This article was written in such a way that skimmers are very likely to walk away with a gross misunderstanding. I'm far from the only person to do so.
- maxerickson 11y agoYou should consider moving the "after this deal" para to the top of your comment. Apparently people are reading too fast or something.
- jsprogrammer 11y agoNo, the post was edited to remove the offending language. Go go transparency