4 ms·
Those percentages aren't volumes, they're dollars. The profitability is built in to the numbers.
by Amezarak 11y ago
Those percentages aren't volumes, they're dollars. The profitability is built in to the numbers.
- Retric 11y agoFirst, there is a giant spike of exports from ~1944 to 1952 where exports hit ~5% GDP over imports. This brought a lot of money not just to businesses, but also individual households. Imports only really grow past exports in ~1975. Second, %GDP just says how much money exchanged hands. The important number for wealth accumulation is value capture. Aka Profit not Revenue. China has a huge chunk of worldwide manufacturing, but its mostly low margin sales slowing their wealth accumulation. PS: Foxconn employs 1.3 million people and has 4.106 billion in profit. Apple has more than 10x the profit with less than 1/10th the number of workers.
- jordanb 11y agoThose exports were lend/lease and the Marshall plan. They were funded with US Govt. debt. Which is to say, they were funded with domestic stimulus spending.
- Retric 11y agoTotal government debt was dropping over that time period.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- jordanb 11y agoIt absolutely was not in dollar terms. As a % of GDP perhaps, simply because the economy was growing so fast. The government ran an aggregate of $120 billion in deficits over those years and only $22.5 billion in surpluses. The Marshal plan was 1948-1953 and the Korean War was 1949-1953.