4 ms·

Am I missing something, or is this article virtually content-free?

• coherentpony 11y ago
  You are not missing anything.
• cbsmith 11y ago
  Wait, the domain is called "modernescpp.com", that's Moderns Cpp... not Modern Cpp. Wow, that's not good....
  • Certhas 11y ago
    That's intentional as it is a translation of a German blog: > Because the roots of my blogs are in German, I will continue to call him Modernes C++. That is not by mistake. http://www.modernescpp.com/index.php/warum-einen-blog-zu-modernem-c http://www.modernescpp.com/index.php/warum-einen-blog-zu-mod... Not saying it's a good decision...
    • cbsmith 11y ago
      I'd would say that even in German, the brand was pretty well established: http://www.amazon.de/Modernes-Design-Programmierung-Entwurfsmuster-Professional/dp/3826613473?ie=UTF8&keywords=alexandrescu&qid=1462439813&ref_=sr_1_2&sr=8-2 http://www.amazon.de/Modernes-Design-Programmierung-Entwurfs...
  • capote 11y ago
    Assuming in German C++ is neuter, and referred to with the das article, Modernes Cpp is correct and singular.
    • 77pt77 11y ago
      > German C++ is neuter neuter, was that intentional?
      • iso-8859-1 11y ago
        Hover over the n here: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Plus#German https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Plus#German
    • detaro 11y ago
      It is.
    • cbsmith 11y ago
      No, I totally get that it is a German variant of the English expression "Modern C++", but you have a fair bit of overlap with a very well established brand in the C++ community...