Well, in that case we could also discuss whether Wikipedia could be considered the best information you can read. Also, would Wikipedia be as updated as, say, a

Well, in that case we could also discuss whether Wikipedia could be considered the best information you can read. Also, would Wikipedia be as updated as, say, an investigative report about NSA misconduct published by the New Yorker? I mean, the absolute value of the medium has not been taken into account nor weighted in the study. Editorial worthiness is certainly something we can talk about, but I wouldn't consider it as a meaningful replacement for the lack of a statistically and numerically relevant point in the study.