I don't want to pick on any individual response, but the amount of close-minded - and arrogant - replies on this thread is pretty sad. The OP has many valid poi

I don't want to pick on any individual response, but the amount of close-minded - and arrogant - replies on this thread is pretty sad. The OP has many valid points. I've interviewed hundreds of candidates - some well, some not so well - and been interviewed many times. I've had four offers in my last five interviews, so I'm not bitter about the process, but I do think most interview processes are far more amateurish than the people they're trying to weed out. Interviewing should be about finding a fit between a worker and work that needs to be done. The best predictor of that is past success doing similar work. It's not about imitating Google's process, and except in increasingly rare situations, it has very little to do with academic computer science. And there is never a need to treat anyone rudely. So don't.