6 ms·
Secrets about numbers
- giu 17y agoNice one. I entered 3.14, but the results page didn't mention anything about PI. Looks like it just rounds the entered number. Pity! :) But it's still cool!
- dmn001 17y agoInteresting page, the rest of the site is good reading too. I tend to use Wolfram Alpha quite a lot for this: e.g. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=3.14 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=3.14
- ch 17y agoI tried that one too (3.141 actually); then I tried 'pi', but it told me to check Google.
- zoba 17y agoIt also wont say anything about sqrt(-1) :(
- wlievens 17y agosqrt(-1) doesn't exist and i isn't a number, is it?
- micampe 17y agoI'm sure 0 is a fine number, but I only like to talk about positive things.
- zeynel1 17y agoVery nice page. More on her page http://www.tanyakhovanova.com/ http://www.tanyakhovanova.com/
- MaysonL 17y agoAnd her son got his MIT CS PHD last year - with Sussman as his advisor. PDF of the thesis: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/49525/MIT-CSAIL-TR-2009-053.pdf?sequence=1 http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/49525/MIT-CSAI...
- grogers 17y agoI wonder what percentage of queries is 42?
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- Groxx 17y agoAwww, "I'm sure 1234567890 is a fine number, but I do not yet know any interesting gossip about numbers bigger than 9999." And I agree with zoba, "i" would've been a good one to include. Given that the number properties are based off things that can be calculated from the number, why is there such a small limit? I mean, preventing 500-digit numbers makes sense for sheer computational difficulty, but only 4 digits?