5 ms·
Link bait misleading headline. Flagged. >> "THE GLORIOUS BRITISH GOVERNMENT, upon which the sun finally set almost 100 years ago, has decided that having open
by axod 17y ago
Link bait misleading headline. Flagged.
>> "THE GLORIOUS BRITISH GOVERNMENT, upon which the sun finally set almost 100 years ago, has decided that having open WiFi networks is bad for the general population and it wants them all shut off."
No. One unelected lord Mandleson who was kicked out of the commons twice and then made a lord by his cronies, otherwise known as Darth Vader, is trying to get his poorly thought out bill through. He doesn't represent the government, and he certainly doesn't represent the UK.
This is a mainly crazy proposed bill that is pretty moot. Despite it being completely crazy, there's likely going to be an election very soon.
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitaleconomy/stages.html http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/digitaleconomy/s...
It's not even through the house of lords yet, let alone house of commons.
This sort of tripe anti-uk article has no place anywhere, let alone HN.
- nazgulnarsil 17y agodo you know why this sort of article is easily believable?
- axod 17y agoBecause some people believe everything they read on Reddit? For example the tripe about the UK being overrun with CCTV cameras that are centrally monitored by the government. As more and more people get their news from the internet, and don't bother fact checking, this will only increase. Rumor will rule. Knee jerk will be standard. Sad really how mob rule works.
- bartl 17y agoThere are over 10000 cameras in the city of London alone. (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23412867-tens-of-thousands-of-cctv-cameras-yet-80-of-crime-unsolved.do http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23412867-tens-of-...) I'd call that pretty much "overrun", yes.
- axod 17y agoYes, and the vast majority of those are going to some crappy VHS tape, which tapes over the previous days tape. They are in place so that if a crime happens, the shop owner can replay the tape or give it to the police. Why would I care if individual shop owners want to put CCTV in their shop? The problem is, that people assume it's some big conspiracy, and all your movements are tracked by the government. It's all been setup by the government to spy on people. The reality however, is that in the 70s,80s, CCTV became so cheap that individual shop owners could buy them and have them as a little deterrent. Also "The city of London alone" is fact fudging. Most CCTV is going to be in the city of London as it's the capital. Elsewhere in the UK usage is going to be less.
- ErrantX 17y agoEnlighten us :P seriously though the entire piece should ring bells. Example: Most legal experts say it will become impossible for small businesses to offer WiFi access to their customers. Really? No citations there? Then the admission at the end that actually it probably wont affect them practically because they are too small....
- andyjenn 17y agoSlight aside, but thanks for posting that link. I was confused at your "let alone house of commons" bit as I never realised a bill could be started from either house.. http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage_bill/index.htm http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage_bill/index.h...
- ableal 17y ago[Mandelson] doesn't represent the government Now, I'm confused. The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (and First Secretary of State, cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson ) does not represent the UK government ?
- ErrantX 17y agoIt's a mess; and one we (the populace) are generally quite angry about. Mandelson was an MP but got disgraced and booted out some time back (I only vaguely remember it). He's well known for being sleazy. Anyway somehow he's ended up a Lord; which means he is unelected. And then Gordon Brown gave him this cabinet position. The sum result of it is that one of the most powerful and influential people in our government is unelected :( So when people say he doesn't represent the UK Government what we really mean is he doesn't represent the elected government (you will find us brits tend to get vey mad about Mandelson :))
- ableal 17y agoThanks for the explanation. I was partially aware of the "got-to-be-elected" to be in the cabinet part, just didn't think of it carrying so far in your mind as to make him a sort of outsider ...
- Roridge 17y agoI didn't post it as linkbait. I posted it (with the original headline from the site) because I was interested in people opinions and reactions. I am glad it has been discussed as it has, so I hope it isn't removed.