4 ms·
Well, that and asking how the analysis would look if they didn't throw away all the 250 years of data in the middle. Fortunately they did present the full data
by ktRolster 11y ago
Well, that and asking how the analysis would look if they didn't throw away all the 250 years of data in the middle.
Fortunately they did present the full data in the paper (top graph is Japan, bottom Europe): http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/srep/2016/160426/srep25061/images_hires/w926/srep25061-f1.jpg http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/srep/2016/160426/sr...
Even though they omitted it while drawing the trend lines.
- nkurz 11y agoYes, they graph the data. What I was asking for was an analysis that includes that data. My guess is that it would produce a much flatter (although still increasing) line, and that it would be much harder (although still possible) to assert that the modern rate of change is dramatically higher.