4 ms·

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-... Pick a different example if you'd like; plenty of "foundations" exist only to let some oligarch's kids play philanthropist.

tgb 10y ago
That example is of a secretary of state potentially being influenced by foreign donations, going around the usual laws against campaign contributions from foreign countries. But we're taking about Zuckerberg, who can already take foreign money all he wants. Letting people play philanthropist is kind of the point of a philanthropic foundation.