2 ms·
This is exciting for the `Windows Server Nano` piece that is coming with it. Basically a docker-container-image for windows servers. There was a great talk I
by alexc05 11y ago
This is exciting for the `Windows Server Nano` piece that is coming with it.
Basically a docker-container-image for windows servers.
There was a great talk I saw just yesterday https://youtu.be/XVtsw-uzovA?t=466 https://youtu.be/XVtsw-uzovA?t=466 where Jeffrey Snover goes into detail about the huge advantage of NANO over a full-server
* 2 vs 23 critical patches
* 3 vs 11 reboots
* 11 vs 34 ports open
* 40 vs 1140 second setup time
* 0.4 vs 10.4 GB in VHD size
honestly - containerized deployments are going to be a revolution, and being able to run my legacy projects in a container is going to be phenomenal
I've got a shared hosting environment with 100's of servers on it, we needed to install a missing package on the server and it had to be scheduled out of hours because of the SLA / impact to other clients.
With containers we'd be able to reboot this ONE instance with ~5 seconds without affecting anything else.
- benaadams 11y agoAnd with rolling upgrades of the host https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn850430(v=ws.12).aspx https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn850430(v=ws.12...
- alexc05 11y agoI'm not going to lie here Ben ... I just "Squee'd" a little :) http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Squee http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Squee