I can't seem to connect your two sentences. Is your claim that solar energy would not collapse if subsidies were removed? I can think of a few examples of sola

I can't seem to connect your two sentences. Is your claim that solar energy would not collapse if subsidies were removed? I can think of a few examples of solar firms that failed even after being given massive subsidies. I'm not sure to which conflict you refer when you mention an alignment of interests between fossil fuels and conservatives. And I'm not sure how the conflict, whatever it is, relates to whether or not solar companies have a viable business model.