3 ms·
While I agree in general with the content of your first paragraph, your second paragraph has some inaccuracies that I found bothersome. 1) You claim that "weig
by hendzen 17y ago
While I agree in general with the content of your first paragraph, your second paragraph has some inaccuracies that I found bothersome.
1) You claim that "weighted dips and pullups" combined with "jogging up hills a few times a week" amounts to a complete exercise regime. As far as dips and pullups go, the average person would benefit much more from a simple weightlifting routine like Starting Strength. Additionally, HIIT(High Intensity Interval Training) is a far more effective than steady-state cardio.
2) You state that the average person should pursue Olympic lifts if they want to "take it further". Olympic lifts are some of the hardest exercises to perform correctly, and can be dangerous when attempted by untrained novices. While this makes for good competition, this is impractical for the average trainee. The complex movements involved in performing Olympic lifts can be broken down into more isolated sub-movements, e.g. military press and the power clean rather than the entire clean and jerk. These sub-lifts are far easier to master, and thus more worthwhile to any trainee not looking to compete in an Olympic-style lifting competition.
- nazgulnarsil 17y agoof course they would benefit more from more intense, comprehensive exercise. the point is that you can get in excellent shape with 1/10th of the commitment and effort that such a comprehensive program demands. constantly worrying over your next major gains is what makes the fitness habit so hard to maintain.