3 ms·
Some context is necessary here, because as engi_nerd explained, it's not as if the primary flight control system is crashing and having to be rebooted in mid-ai
by alphapapa 11y ago
Some context is necessary here, because as engi_nerd explained, it's not as if the primary flight control system is crashing and having to be rebooted in mid-air. It's more like a separate system that's used by maintenance personnel on the ground. Of course, if the aircraft's maintenance procedures are designed around it, then deploying a whole wing of them isn't going to work very well, because high-performance aircraft are high-maintenance aircraft.
But I can't help but think of Battlestar Galactica. At what point does this software become too complicated? At what point does it become a vulnerability to be exploited by the enemy, or simply a liability reducing readiness below what's needed in wartime? I don't recall hearing stories about the F-16's or F/A-18's computers crashing and needing to be rebooted (or even the F-22's).
- noir_lord 11y agoF-22 did have some howlers (the computers crapping out when they flew across an international dateline rings a bell) but as someone who casually follows high tech stuff including military equipment I don't remember anything on the scale of the issues they are having with the F-35. I think a lot of it comes back to scope creep, the F-22 was designed for one branch by one branch to do one thing well, the F-35 was designed for multiple branches by multiple branches to do a bunch of things somewhat well. It's an absolute bear of a programme.