Sorry, that's not right. What I meant was at this point, we just won't know. Or are we assuming that the FDA would've never caught on and shut them down if it w

Sorry, that's not right. What I meant was at this point, we just won't know. Or are we assuming that the FDA would've never caught on and shut them down if it wasn't for WSJ? That they would've let fraudulent testing go on unabated. I don't know really know what WSJ did that wouldn't have otherwise come up in regular FDA proceedings other than telling a bunch of millionaires they were stupid with their money. P.S: To my point there are two articles on the HN frontpage about Theranos just today. This now seems like click-bait hoarding. The original WSJ piece was obviously warranted (if for anything then as a warning to SV biotech investors).