3 ms·

Just about every large project has a bundler step for production. Many have for dev as well, but this is unequivocally an undesirable thing. You can't beat Ref

• WorldMaker 11y ago
  In dev workflows you can deal with the extra few milliseconds of transpilation time just like you deal with the extra few milliseconds of overhead from any of your other dev tools. Plus, even a bunch of dev workflows are increasingly using tools like gulp-watch in the background of their refresh cycle (for whatever reasons), and Typescript's watch support has gotten very good.
  • Touche 11y ago
    You can "deal with" a lot of things, but that doesn't make them desirable. It's not like the community has evolved towards build scripts because build scripts are great, it evolved in that direction because the ecosystem has changed faster than the web has been able to keep up. Once the web catches up on the module front you'll definitely see the refresh workflow regain some lost popularity.
    • WorldMaker 11y ago
      Maybe? There's always an "ES Next" in the evergreen world. There's always some feature you might want to use today that a build tool makes accessible that otherwise you'd wait months/years for browser support to "catch up". The goal posts will keep moving, especially now that TC39 is working on an "agile" yearly spec release cycle. After modules there's async/await and after that there's plenty more future to discover...
• Keats 11y ago
  I'd say live reload beats refresh for dev workflows (when it works).