3 ms·
Yes. Markets are a method of exchange, and free markets have a choice of producers by consumers and competition. Restrictions (or lack thereof) on capital accum
by oarsinsync 11y ago
Yes. Markets are a method of exchange, and free markets have a choice of producers by consumers and competition. Restrictions (or lack thereof) on capital accumulation are not relevant.
- catnaroek 11y agoI don't see how the state could implement restrictions on capital accumulation, without regulating certain markets and industries (primarily the financial industry).
- bad_user 11y agoFor a market to exist, it must facilitate trading of things that have value. When value is lost and a market no longer possible due to the environment, is that really a restriction? In other words, if the state placed restrictions on capital accumulation, then there wouldn't be a need to restrict the "financial industry" as such a thing would cease to exist. Just like how a fish market wouldn't be possible without any fish left on earth.